App Development

App Development

Slots composition is a new way to declare a React component in your store theme code.

Working simarly to the blocks and children composition, the slots allows you to use React props instead of passing an array of blocks when rendering a component on the store UI.

It enables Store Framework users to be way more flexible when developing the store theme by removing the need for the allowed property in the components' interface definitions!

Some advantages of using slots over the traditional blocks composition are, namely:

  • No need for blocks attribute when implementing a component in the store theme. Users just need to pass the desired blocks as regular props.
  • No need for the allowed interface attribute. Any block from any app can be declared as a regular prop.

Practical example

Let's suppose you are trying to create a hello-world block. At first, it could be as simple as:

// HelloWorld.tsx import React from 'react' const HelloWorld = () => <div>Hello, world!</div> export default HelloWorld
// interfaces.json { "hello-world": { "component": "HelloWorld" } }

Let's now set up an icon to be displayed right above the "Hello, world!" text:

// HelloWorld.tsx import React, { ReactElement } from 'react' const HelloWorld = ({ Icon }) => ( <div className="tc pv5"> <Icon size={32} /> <h1 className="t-heading-1 c-on-base">Hello, world!<h1> </div> ) export default HelloWorld

Notice that in the example above the icon is being declared via props to the HelloWorld component, clarifying how the slots composition logic works in the development flow.

In practice, users would pass this value to the theme block hello-world, as shown in the json example below:

{ "hello-world": { "props": { "Icon": "icon-caret#point-up" } }, "icon-caret#point-up": { "props": { "orientation": "up" } } }

According to the slots composition logic, there is no need to use the allowed field in the block's interface definition the component it displays works independently.

What is the difference between slots and blocks composition?

If you've been using Store Framework for a while, you are probably familiar with the blocks property - whose functionality is the same as the slots'.

According to the blocks prop logic, you could configure your theme as shown below and still achieve pretty much the same results on your store UI:

{ "hello-world": { "blocks": ["icon-caret#point-up"] }, "icon-caret#point-up": { "props": { "orientation": "up" } } }
// HelloWorld.tsx import React from 'react' import { ExtensionPoint } from 'vtex.render-runtime' const HelloWorld = () => ( <div className="tc pv5"> <ExtensionPoint id="icon-caret" size={32} /> <h1 className="t-heading-1 c-on-base">Hello, world!<h1> </div> ) export default HelloWorld
// interfaces.json { "hello-world": { "component": "HelloWorld", "allowed": ["icon-caret"] } }

However, if we decide to use the blocks composition as shown above, we would face some restrictions, such as:

  • The hello-world block would only be able to receive an icon-caret block. Any other icon-* block, or any block whatsoever, would not work. To make it work we would need to allow each different block users would be able to use.
  • The blocks approach would also be trickier to implement in HelloWorld.tsx because we would need to check which block was passed by the user to then pass its ID to the ExtensionPoint component.
  • Through the use of ExtensionPoints, we would not be able to render multiple instances of the same block as well. For example, if we wanted to render icon-caret#foo and icon-caret#bar in our HelloWorld component, we would not be able to do so using <ExtensionPoint id="icon-caret" />, since this would be ambiguous. Also, the user would not be able to pass multiple instances of the same block to hello-world, such as:
{ "hello-world": { "blocks": ["icon-caret#point-up", "icon-caret#point-down"] }, "icon-caret#point-up": { "props": { "orientation": "up" } }, "icon-caret#point-down": { "props": { "orientation": "down" } } }

The main difference, therefore, is that we can offer much more flexibility to our users when using the slots composition.


There are some limitations put in place to guarantee that your slots will be working consistently:

  1. Slots are always exposed via PascalCased props. This is very important because otherwise our builder would not be able to identify the props as slots which, in turn, would block the component rendering:
{ "props": { // Does NOT work. This will be interpreted as a string by store builder "icon": "icon-caret" } }
{ "props": { // Works! "Icon": "icon-caret" } }
  1. Nested slots are not currently supported. This means that you can't have a slot prop inside of an object, such as shown below:
{ "props": { "somePropThatsAnObject": { "p1": "this", "p2": "will", "p3": "not", "p4": "work", // This will NOT be picked up by the store builder "Slot": "some-block" } } }
Photo of the contributor
Photo of the contributor
+ 2 contributors
Was this helpful?
Suggest edits (Github)
Site Editor
Sponsor Account
Photo of the contributor
Photo of the contributor
+ 2 contributors
On this page